In the world of militaria, collectors often gravitate toward medals and insignia – not merely for their material rarity, but for the silent stories they tell. Each badge, ribbon, or emblem is a thread in a much larger historical tapestry. While some medals are well-documented awards for valor or service, others speak a more subtle, complex language – one of identity, loyalty, ideology, and sacrifice. To understand their full significance is to understand not just military history, but the personal and political messages embedded in these metal symbols.
More Than Decoration: The Semiotics of Medals
At first glance, a medal may seem like a decorative token: shining metal, a colored ribbon, perhaps the image of a monarch or national symbol. But every design choice in a military medal is deliberate. Heraldry, iconography, and even the colors of the ribbons are chosen not just to distinguish one award from another, but to evoke certain values or ideals.
Consider the British Victoria Cross: made from the bronze of melted-down enemy cannons, it is not only an award for extraordinary bravery but also a symbolic transformation of war material into honor. Or take the German Iron Cross, whose austere design and sharp, almost Gothic, form convey martial strength and national identity.
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0
These items operate within a dense symbolic system. A laurel wreath might signify victory, while a star often suggest guidance or excellence. Even the number of points on a star, or the specific animals depicted (eagles, lions, dragons), can carry layered meanings rooted in military tradition or mythology.
The specific shades of ribbon colors often carry nuanced meanings. Red might symbolize bloodshed and valor, blue might represent loyalty or service at sea, and green could signal medical or humanitarian aid. Over time, even combinations of colors become instantly recognizable, such as the rainbow-hued Victory Medals issued after World War I – symbols of global unity after global catastrophe.
Insignia as Identity and Ideology
While medals usually reward action, insignia represent belonging. Shoulder patches, cap badges, collar tabs – they serve to identify a soldier’s unit, rank, branch, or nation. But their meanings can go far deeper.
During World War II, Allied and Axis powers alike developed extensive systems of insignia that went beyond organization. For instance, the Waffen-SS used runic symbols to align itself with mythological Germanic traditions and National Socialist ideology. The double lightning-bolt SS symbol was not just a logo – it was a modern invocation of ancient power structures, designed to impress fear and ideological unity.
In contrast, the U.S. Army Airborne Division’s “Screaming Eagle” patch was designed to instill pride and aggressiveness, suggesting sharpness, freedom, and rapid action from above. Soldiers didn’t just wear their division’s emblem – they internalized it’s traits.
As historian John Keegan once noted, “A soldier’s identity is never just personal – it is organizational, symbolic, and national.”
In the Cold War era, insignia also became markers of political alignment. NATO and Warsaw Pact forces developed visual languages that subtly (or overtly) referenced their ideologies – capitalist freedom versus socialist unity, defensive postures versus offensive might. For collectors, these Cold War insignia are more than military designations; they are cultural artifacts of global polarization.
Regional Variants and Cultural Nuances
In collecting, context is everyting. The same medal issued in two different countries may hold vastly different meanings based on its origin. For example, Soviet and Russian medals are typically heavy with political ideology. The Order of Lenin, adorned with the profile of Vladimir Lenin himself, was not only an award of high honor – it functioned as an ideological instrument, reinforcing the moral authority of the Communist state.
Compare that to Japan’s Order of the Rising Sun, which reflects Shinto symbology and imperial heritage. Though both awards recognize state service, they do so with cultural overtones that highlight each nation’s self-image: collective labor and ideological purity on one hand, refined tradition and loyalty on the other.
Even subtle design features such as placement of cherry blossoms, swords, or dragons can signal regionally specific meanings. A Western eye may see a decorative pattern, but in East Asia, those elements might encode centuries of philosophy or spiritual meaning.
In colonial contexts, medals often carried dual layers of meaning – intended by the colonizing power to recognize loyalty or service, but sometimes received by the colonized as ambiguous or even coercive symbols. The British Empire’s practice of awarding native troops with honors featuring Queen Victoria’s effigy carried powerful and contradictory messages of inclusion and domination.
Medals of Absence: What’s Not Said
Intriguingly, sometimes the absence of a medal speaks louder than its presence. In militaria collections, it’s not uncommon to encounter incomplete medal groups. A missing clasp or a broken ribbon bar can lead to important questions: Was the recipient dishonorably discharged? Did they never complete a particular campaign? Did the metal get removed for political reasons after a regime change?
After World War II, several German military medals were banned or modified to remove swastikas and other overt Nazi symbolism. Yet even in their sanitized versions, collectors recognize their historical weight – and the state’s attempt to erase or rewrite meaning. What remains, then, is not just an object, but a contested memory.
In some cases, medals were never awarded at all – because the soldier’s deeds were politically inconvenient, because they died before recognition, or because the war’s outcome rendered their contributions awkward. These phantom honors create spaces of speculation, giving rise to collector myths and mystery.
Symbolic Hierarchies: Order of Precedence
Another hidden layer of meaning lies in how medals are worn. The order of precedence, strictly regulated by military dress codes, reflects a hierarchy of values. A decoration for gallantry in the face of the enemy almost always outranks one for long service, regardless of the years invested.
Collectors who understand this subtle visual ranking can often read a soldier’s entire career at a glance – frontline service, theaters of war, wounds sustained, campaigns fought. Even the position of medals (above or below the heart, on the right or left chest, with or without miniature versions) is carefully curated to cummunicate honor and sacrifice.
To the untrained eye, these arrangements might seem bureaucratic. But to a historian or collector, they offer a kind of living résumé carved in metal and ribbon.
Furthermore, some medals gain additional prestige not only from where they are worn, but when. Wearing certain medals in public or during state functions is itself a performance – a claim to legitimacy, authority, or continuity. Monarchs, presidents, and generals carefully choose which medals they display, and which they do not.
Commemoration and Control
Sometimes the issuance of a medal is less about recognizing past action and more about shaping future behavior. Medals have historically been used to encourage loyalty, reinforce discipline, and promote ideological cohesion.
Take for instance, the Chinese “Merit Medal” system, which emphasizes not only martial success but political reliability. Or the Soviet tradition of awarding medals to entire cities – such as the “Hero City” award – thereby turning medals into tools of collective memory and national myth-making.
These are not just honors, but instruments of commemoration and control, part of a broader strategy to write history from the top down. For the collector, this adds another dimension: medals are not passive artifacts, but active participants in the shaping of historical narrative.
In modern times, even democratic states have continued to use medals for soft power purposes. Humanitarian and peacekeeping medals, often issued by international coalitions like the UN or NATO, attempt to blend military identity with diplomatic narrative – recasting the soldier not only as warrior, but as moral actor.
Medals as Emotional Heirlooms
Collectors often describe a kind of reverence when holding a medal, especially if it still bears its original case, certificate, or photograph. Beyond its official meaning, each medal also carries an emotional weight – a connection to a person, a battlefield, a moment in time. A bloodstained ribbon or a dented badge might hint at a story more visceral than any citation can capture.
It is here that the hidden meaning becomes most personal. A son who receives his father’s campaign medals inherits not just a symbol of service, but a legacy. In these cases, the line between collector and custodian becomes beautifully blurred.
Medals can even trigger emotional responses in strangers. A Purple Heart spotted in a flea market, a Croix de Guerre tucked into a forgotten drawer – these objects demand attention, care, and remembrance. For many collectors, it’s not about value – it’s about rescue. Each medal sved from obscurity becomes a small act of historical justice.
Final Thoughts
To understand medals and insignia is to unlock a powerful form of historical literacy. These are not just collectibles – they are compressed documents of identity, ideology, hierarchy and memory. They speak to both national myths and personal sacrifices, to both bureaucracy and bravery.
For the militaria enthusiast, the joy lies not just in acquisition but in interpretation. Every piece, no matter how small, offers a glimpse into a larger world of meaning – hidden, layered, and waiting to be uncovered.
“The medal may shine in the daylight, but its true story is cast in shadows.” -Anonymous collector
Bas de Vries – 12-07-2025
References
- Keegan, J. (1983). The Face of Battle. Penguin Books.
A seminal work in military history, offering insight into the identity and psychological experience of soldiers. - Kaplan, F. (1987). The Insignia and Decorations of the U.S. Armed Forces. Chartwell Books.
Provides detailed historical and symbolic explanations of American military insignia and medals. - Foster, F. J. (2002). British Campaign Medals 1815–1914. Shire Publications.
Covers British military medals and their symbolic significance. - Woods, R. (2010). Symbols of Honor: Military Medals and Their Stories. Smithsonian Institution Press.
A comprehensive account of medals from various cultures, including U.S., Soviet, and British examples. - McNab, C. (2014). The SS: 1923–1945. Amber Books.
Provides context on the visual language and ideology behind Waffen-SS insignia and medals. - Petrov, N. (2005). Soviet Orders and Medals. Aurora Art Publishers.
Discusses ideological and symbolic aspects of Soviet honors. - Tamura, L. (2020). Order of the Rising Sun. In Encyclopedia of Japanese Military and Civil Orders. Tokyo University Press.
Analyzes Japanese medal symbolism and cultural roots.